Jesseract

Don’t get me wrong, I’m really glad that wide attention is finally being paid to the conditions of animals in factory farms. The Washington Post has a story today revealing the findings of two new studies.

Factory farming takes a big, hidden toll on human health and the environment, is undermining rural America’s economic stability and fails to provide the humane treatment of livestock increasingly demanded by American consumers, concludes an independent, 2 1/2 -year analysis that calls for major changes in the way corporate agriculture produces meat, milk and eggs.

The only problem with these “new” findings? I read about them way back in 2001, in Eric Schlosser’s Fast Food Nation, and more recently in Michael Pollan’s Omnivore’s Dilemma.

Doesn’t it seem like the Union of Concerned Scientists and the Pew Charitable Trust (PDF link) could have saved 2 1/2 years of effort and money by simply endorsing one or both of these books? At the very least, I would think they owe the two authors some sort of acknowledgement for the work they’ve done in raising awareness with the general public.

In other news, the World Bank has said that “the grain required to fill a 25-gallon sport-utility vehicle tank with ethanol could feed one person for a year.” Yet Bush still insists on ethanol subsidies, in the face of world food shortages.

“In terms of the international situation, we are deeply concerned about food prices here at home, and we’re deeply concerned about people who don’t have food abroad,” Bush told a news conference.

He said the rise in food prices has been caused by weather, increased demand and energy prices, while only a small part is due to the production of corn-based ethanol.

“And the truth of the matter is, it’s in our national interest that we — our farmers — grow energy, as opposed to us purchasing energy from parts of the world that are unstable or may not like us.”